Evictly

2709 Lakeshore Holding Inc. v Offei et al

Split/Other wins · Etobicoke · 2024-01-09

Adjudicator
E. Patrick Shea
Dispute
Renovation
Notice
N13
Landlord
2709 Lakeshore Holding Inc.
Tenant
E.O., G.A., R.H., K.H., L.H.
Landlord rep
Francisco Gomez
Tenant rep
Robert Szollosy

What happened

The Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancies and evict the Tenants because the Landlord requires vacant possession of the rental units to do major repairs or renovations that require vacant possession.

The ruling

The applications are dismissed because the Landlord did not comply with subsection 71.1(3) of the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 by identifying all previous N13 notices delivered. The LTB shall not accept for filing an L2 application that does not comply with subsection 71.1(3), and the applications accepted for filing in contravention of subsection 71.1(3) are nullities and cannot be the basis for an order under section 69.