Ayerswood Development v Ruttle

Tenant wins · London · 2022-01-20

Adjudicator

Jitewa Edu

Dispute

Eviction Order Set Aside

Landlord

A.D.

Tenant

C.R., B.R.

Landlord rep

L. Todd

What happened

Tenants filed a motion to set aside an eviction order (SWL-48816-21) because they paid the required amount under subsection 74(11) of the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 to void the order before it was enforced.

The ruling

The Landlord and Tenant Board ordered that the previous eviction order (SWL-48816-21) is void and cannot be enforced by the Landlord. This decision was based on the Tenants' payment of $9,530.00, which exceeded the amount required to void the eviction order and cover the Landlord's non-refundable fee.