Bates v Crandon
Tenant wins · Southampton · 2022-01-07
- Adjudicator
- Khalid Akram
- Dispute
- Personal Use
- Notice
- None
- Amount
- <$5K
- Landlord
- J.B., D.B.
- Tenant
- C.C., J.C.
- Landlord rep
- Miranda Medve
- Tenant rep
- Duty Counsel
What happened
Landlords applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenants because the Landlord has entered into an agreement of purchase and sale of the rental unit and the purchaser requires possession of the rental unit for the purpose of residential occupation.
The ruling
The Landlords' application is dismissed. The Tenants shall pay back $1,209.25 to the Landlords, representing the one month's rent compensation given to the Tenants.