Bromwich v IMH Pool XVIII LP

Landlord wins · Mississauga · 2022-02-18

Adjudicator

Frank Ebner

Dispute

Substantial interference, Withholding of vital service

Landlord

IMH Pool XVIII LP

Tenant

L.B.

Landlord rep

Matt Anderson

What happened

Tenant applied for an order determining that the Landlord substantially interfered with her reasonable enjoyment of the rental unit or residential complex, and withheld or deliberately interfered with the reasonable supply of a vital service, care service, or food that the Landlord is obligated to supply under the tenancy agreement. The issues were related to balcony repairs and airflow in the unit.

The ruling

The Tenant's application was dismissed. The Landlord was found to have fulfilled its obligation to maintain the property in a good state of repair, and the interference caused by the balcony repairs was not unreasonable in the circumstances.