CD v IPV c/o GI
Landlord wins · 2014-09-15
- Dispute
- Substantial Interference
- Landlord
- I.C.G.
- Tenant
- C.
- Landlord rep
- AS
What happened
Tenant applied for an order determining that the Landlord or the Landlord's superintendent or agent substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment of the rental unit or residential complex by the Tenant or by a member of her household due to excessive noise from a neighboring unit.
The ruling
The Tenant's application was dismissed. The Board found that the Tenant failed to convince the Board that the tenant in unit 611 was making unreasonable noise, that he had threatened and harassed the Tenant, and that the Landlord had substantially interfered with the Tenant's reasonable enjoyment of the rental unit by failing to deal with the Tenant's noise complaints.