CM v YD

Split/Other wins · 2017-04-13

Dispute

Harassment, Illegal Entry, Maintenance, Substantial Interference

Landlord

Y.

Tenant

C.

Tenant rep

Legal Aid Clinic Representative

What happened

Tenant applied for orders determining that Landlord harassed, obstructed, coerced, threatened or interfered with the Tenant, entered the rental unit illegally and substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment of the rental unit or residential complex by the Tenant or by a member of their household. The Tenant also applied for an order determining that the Landlord failed to meet the Landlord's maintenance obligations under the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 or failed to comply with health, safety, housing or maintenance standards.

The ruling

The request to review order CET-64654-17, issued on March 31, 2017, is denied. The order is confirmed and remains unchanged.