Cruz v Capi and Mountain-Larocque
Tenant wins · Ridgeway · 2022-01-11
- Dispute
- Persistent late payment, Substantial interference
- Notice
- Substantial interference (N5), Persistent late payment (N8)
- Landlord
- S.C.
- Tenant
- C.C., M.M.
What happened
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenants due to persistent late payment of rent and substantial interference with the reasonable enjoyment or lawful right, privilege or interest of the Landlord or another tenant.
The ruling
The Landlord's application was dismissed because the notices of termination were not valid as they did not identify the rental unit.