D.M. and Z.G. v D.H. and S.A.S.

Landlord wins · 2014-09-14

Dispute

Disposal Of Property, Harassment, Substantial Interference

Landlord

D.

Tenant

D., Z.

Landlord rep

S.A.S.

What happened

Tenants applied for an order determining that the Landlord and Superintendent harassed, obstructed, coerced, threatened or interfered with them and substantially interfered with their reasonable enjoyment of the rental unit or residential complex, and that the Landlord did not make the Tenants' property available to be retrieved at a location close to the rental unit within 72 hours after the Tenants were evicted.

The ruling

The Tenants' application is dismissed. There is no basis for a finding against the Landlord regarding the Tenants' access to their belongings after the eviction, and no foundation on a balance of probabilities that the Landlord was otherwise in breach of the Act.