Dyspar & Associates v Tenants

Landlord wins · Bradford · 2021-01-12

Adjudicator

Michael Di Salle

Dispute

Rent Reduction

Landlord

Dyspar & Associates

Tenant

T.A., M.A., Y.A., J.B., F.B., N.B., J.C., N.C., D.D., C.D., E.E., J.E., A.F., J.H., J.H., G.J., C.K., P.K., M.K., S.M., B.M., K.N., J.P., G.R., D.S., L.S., D.S., E.S., E.T., N.V., K.V., J.W., S.W.

What happened

Landlord applied for an order to vary the percentage rent reduction determined under section 132 of the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 because the residential complex falls under the multi-residential property tax class and the amount of the municipal property taxes does not rise to 20% of the total annual rents charged, and because there is an error in the calculation of the rent reduction contained in the Notice of Rent Reduction issued by the Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury.

The ruling

The rent reduction set out in the Notice of Rent Reduction issued by the Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury dated September 10, 2019 is varied from 1.9860% to 0.77% effective December 31, 2019.