ENPC v CR

Split/Other wins · 2016-07-14

Dispute

Illegal Act, Substantial Interference

Notice

N5, N6

Landlord

E.

Tenant

C.

Landlord rep

K.A.

Tenant rep

J.K.

What happened

Landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant due to substantial interference and illegal acts. Tenant applied for orders determining harassment, obstruction, coercion, threats or interference by the Landlord's superintendent or agent.

The ruling

The Board found deficiencies in the N5 and N6 notices served by the Landlord and severed certain paragraphs. The Tenant's request to withdraw one of the applications was denied. The Board ruled that the Landlord's affidavit from MJ was admissible as evidence.