Feenstra v Bond
Tenant wins · Kerwood · 2022-11-03
- Adjudicator
- Amanda Kovats
- Dispute
- Personal use
- Notice
- Personal use (N12)
- Amount
- <$5K
- Landlord
- J.P.
- Tenant
- R.B.
- Landlord rep
- David Allen Price
What happened
Landlord applied to terminate tenancy and evict Tenant for personal use by the purchaser's son. The application was dismissed as the proposed occupation did not meet the definition of residential occupation required by the Residential Tenancies Act.
The ruling
The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for personal use was dismissed. The Board found that the proposed use of the rental unit by the purchaser's son did not constitute 'residential occupation' as required by the Act. The Tenant is ordered to repay $850 compensation received for the N12 notice.