JA v BPI
Landlord wins · 2014-04-25
- Dispute
- Maintenance, Rent Reduction, Substantial Interference
- Landlord
- B.
- Tenant
- J.
- Landlord rep
- DC
What happened
Tenant applied for orders determining that the Landlord (1) substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment of the rental unit or residential complex, (2) failed to meet its maintenance obligations under the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006, and (3) that a rent reduction is justified. The original orders were issued on December 11, 2013, and the Tenant requested a review of those orders.
The ruling
The requests to review the original orders are denied. The original orders are confirmed and remain unchanged.