Evictly

L.G.C. v I.P.

Landlord wins · 2014-11-12

Dispute
Illegal Lock-Out
Landlord
I., I.D.
Tenant
L.
Landlord rep
B.R.

What happened

Tenant applied for an order determining that the Landlord harassed, obstructed, coerced, threatened or interfered with the Tenant, entered the rental unit illegally and altered the locking system on a door giving entry to the rental unit or residential complex without giving the Tenant replacement keys and did not make the Tenant's property available to be retrieved at a location close to the rental unit during the hours of 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. within 72 hours after the Tenant was evicted.

The ruling

The Tenant's application is dismissed as there is no tenancy agreement between the Tenant and the Landlord under the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006. The Landlord was granted a writ of possession by the Superior Court of Justice, which was executed by the Sheriff.