LIUNA NON PROFIT HOUSING CORP v Copeland
Landlord wins · Ottawa · 2023-02-22
- Adjudicator
- Richard Ferriss
- Dispute
- Substantial interference
- Notice
- N5
- Amount
- <$5K
- Landlord
- LIUNA NON PROFIT HOUSING CORP
- Tenant
- J.C.
- Landlord rep
- Trevor Jaquard
What happened
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenant because the Tenant, another occupant of the rental unit or someone the Tenant permitted in the residential complex has substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment or lawful right, privilege or interest of the Landlord or another tenant.
The ruling
The tenancy between the Landlord and the Tenant continues if the Tenant meets the conditions set out in the order. The Tenant shall not directly or indirectly allow her dog to leave the rental unit without a muzzle and shall keep the dog muzzled at all times when the dog is elsewhere in the residential complex. If the Tenant fails to comply, the Landlord may apply for an order terminating the tenancy and evicting the Tenant. The Tenant shall pay the Landlord $186.00 for the cost of filing the application.