Evictly

MK v Numbered Company

Split/Other wins · 2015-03-30

Dispute
Substantial Interference
Landlord
N.C.
Tenant
M.
Landlord rep
AY, ES
Tenant rep
AE, MG

What happened

The Tenant applied for an order determining that the Landlord or the Landlord's superintendent or agent substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment of the rental unit or residential complex by the Tenant or a member of the Tenant's household.

The ruling

The Tenant is entitled to continue to use the parking space at the front of the complex (Unit #15). The Landlord shall assign to the Tenant's rental unit #303 one of the storage sheds in the first row closest to the front entrance. The Landlord shall pay to the Tenant $10.00 for the sign that was disposed of as a result of the Landlord's actions.