PG v PO
Tenant wins · 2017-09-01
- Dispute
- Harassment, Interference With Reasonable Enjoyment
- Amount
- <$5K
- Landlord
- P.
- Tenant
- P.
- Tenant rep
- HS
What happened
Tenant applied for an order determining that Landlord harassed, obstructed, coerced, threatened or interfered with the Tenant and substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment of the rental unit or residential complex by the Tenant or by a member of the Tenant's household.
The ruling
The Landlord has seriously interfered with the Tenant's reasonable enjoyment of the rental unit and the residential complex, and has harassed, threatened and interfered with the Tenant. The Landlord must refrain from such conduct, restore the cable TV service, and pay the Tenant $50 for the cost of filing the application.