PHC v AAMT-T and AAZR
Split/Other wins · 2018-08-15
- Dispute
- Substantial Interference
- Notice
- N5 Notice of Termination
- Amount
- <$5K
- Landlord
- P.
- Tenant
- A., A.
- Landlord rep
- MZ
What happened
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenants due to their substantial interference with the reasonable enjoyment or lawful right, privilege or interest of the Landlord or another tenant. The Landlord served two N5 notices on the Tenants.
The ruling
The tenancy between the Landlord and the Tenants shall continue but subject to the conditions of the order. The Tenants shall not engage in conduct similar to that outlined in the N5 notices and shall not communicate by email or other social media to the Landlord or its representatives, except for emergencies or legitimate maintenance or tenancy issues. The Tenants shall pay the Landlord $190 for the cost of filing the application according to a specified payment schedule.