Purdy v Martel
Landlord wins · Ashton · 2021-11-08
- Adjudicator
- Khalid Akram
- Dispute
- Substantial Interference
- Notice
- Substantial interference (N5)
- Amount
- <$5K
- Landlord
- K.P., M.P.
- Tenant
- G.M.
- Landlord rep
- Jesse Valkenier
What happened
Landlords applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant due to the Tenant substantially interfering with the Landlords' lawful right to show the rental unit to potential purchasers.
The ruling
The Landlords' application for eviction of the Tenant is denied on the condition that the Tenant shall not deny entry to the Landlords if the entry is in accordance with the Residential Tenancies Act. The Tenant is ordered to pay the Landlords $186.00 for the cost of filing the application.