Evictly

Rezapoor v Markovic

Tenant wins · North York · 2021-10-18

Adjudicator
Camille Tancioco
Dispute
Personal Use, Substantial Interference
Notice
Personal use (N12)
Landlord
A.R., V.A.K.
Tenant
T.M.
Landlord rep
B. Vakili

What happened

Landlords applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant due to substantial interference and for the Landlords' own use. The Landlords served a valid N12 notice with a termination date of July 31, 2021.

The ruling

The Landlords' application was dismissed because they did not comply with the requirements of Sections 48.1 and 55.1 of the Residential Tenancies Act. Specifically, the Landlords did not pay the Tenant the required one month's rent compensation by the termination date, nor did they offer the Tenant another rental unit.