SD v AZ

Landlord wins · 2016-05-11

Dispute

Harassment, Illegal Entry, Interference With Reasonable Enjoyment, Interference With Vital Services

Landlord

A.

Tenant

S.

Landlord rep

A K

What happened

Tenant applied for an order determining that Landlord harassed, obstructed, coerced, threatened or interfered with the Tenant; entered the rental unit illegally; substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment of the rental unit or residential complex by the Tenant or by a member of the Tenant's household; and withheld or deliberately interfered with a reasonable supply of a vital service that the Landlord was obligated to supply under the tenancy agreement.

The ruling

The Landlord did not interfere with the Tenant's ability to retrieve her belongings after the eviction. The Landlord is ordered not to interfere with any tenant's mail in the future. The Tenant is ordered to pay $400 in costs to the Landlord and $700 in Board costs.