Sharpe v Bazala
Tenant wins · Harrow · 2022-01-13
- Adjudicator
- Harry Cho
- Dispute
- Bad faith eviction, Maintenance
- Notice
- Tenant rights (T2)
- Landlord
- A.B.
- Tenant
- T.S.
- Landlord rep
- J. Sparling
- Tenant rep
- J. Kulokowski
What happened
The Tenant applied for an order determining that the Landlord harassed, obstructed, coerced, threatened or interfered with the Tenant, substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment of the rental unit or residential complex by the Tenant or by a member of the Tenant's household and withheld or deliberately interfered with the reasonable supply of a vital service, care service, or food that the Landlord is obligated to supply under the tenancy agreement. The Tenant also applied for an order to determine whether the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 applies; to determine that the Landlord failed to meet the Landlord's maintenance obligations under the Act or failed to comply with health, safety, housing or maintenance standards; and to determine that the Landlord gave a notice of termination in bad faith. The Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant because the Landlord's child requires possession of the rental unit for the purpose of residential occupation.
The ruling
The request to review the May 7, 2020 Board Order is denied, and the order is confirmed. The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for the Landlord's child's own use is dismissed. The Tenant's applications are dismissed.