Shieff v T.N.

Landlord wins

Dispute

Maintenance, Tenant Rights

Landlord

D.T., G., H., H.A.E.C.

Tenant

M.C.S.

Landlord rep

D.S., J.S

Tenant rep

J.Q., D.A.

What happened

Tenant applied for an order determining that the Landlords or the Landlords' superintendent or the Landlords' agent harassed, obstructed, coerced, threatened or interfered with the Tenant, entered the rental unit illegally, altered the locking system on a door giving entry to the rental unit or residential complex without giving the Tenant replacement keys, substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment of the rental unit or residential complex by the Tenant or by a member of the Tenant's household and withheld or deliberately interfered with the reasonable supply of a vital service. The Tenant also applied for an order determining that the Landlords failed to meet the Landlords' maintenance obligations under the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 or failed to comply with health, safety, housing or maintenance standards.

The ruling

The request for review does not support a conclusion that there might be a serious error in the order or that a serious error occurred in the proceedings and the Tenant's review request will be dismissed.