Evictly

Sivasubramaniam v Falls

Tenant wins · Oshawa

Adjudicator
Greg Joy
Dispute
Personal Use, Substantial Interference
Notice
Termination of Tenancy
Landlord
K.S., R.S.
Tenant
A.F., S.W.

What happened

Landlords applied to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenants due to substantial interference and for the purpose of residential occupation. The Tenants testified that the termination notice was not properly served and the required compensation was not paid.

The ruling

The Landlords' application is dismissed because the termination notice was not properly served and the required compensation was not paid.