Thibert v Farmer
Tenant wins · Sudbury · 2022-01-06
- Adjudicator
- Khalid Akram
- Dispute
- Personal use
- Notice
- Personal use (N12)
- Amount
- <$5K
- Landlord
- R.T.
- Tenant
- D.F.
- Landlord rep
- Lee-Anne Thibert
What happened
Landlord applied to terminate tenancy and evict Tenant due to an agreement of purchase and sale, claiming the purchaser required possession for residential occupation. Landlord also sought compensation for each day Tenant remained after the termination date.
The ruling
The Landlord's application for termination of tenancy and eviction was dismissed due to insufficient evidence that the Purchasers in good faith required possession for residential occupation. The Tenant is ordered to repay $1,500.00 to the Landlord, representing the one month's rent compensation previously given.