Y.H.C.E.N.-p.H. (metro Toronto) C. v J. S. and J. A.

Split/Other wins · 2017-10-24

Dispute

Illegal Act, Substantial Interference

Notice

N6, N7, N5

Landlord

Y.M.T.C.

Tenant

J.S., J.A.

Landlord rep

M. Z.

Tenant rep

A. L., J. S.

What happened

The landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenants due to substantial interference with the reasonable enjoyment of the residential complex and the tenants or someone living with them committing an illegal act. The tenant also applied for an order determining that the landlord harassed, obstructed, coerced, threatened or interfered with the tenant.

The ruling

The landlord's application TEL-62815-15 was dismissed. The tenant's application TET-69137-16 was dismissed. The landlord's application TEL-65536-16 was partially granted, with a conditional order issued requiring the tenants to refrain from activities that substantially interfere with the reasonable enjoyment of other tenants and to not communicate or interact with a specific tenant.