Ali v Al Mokadm
Landlord wins · Windsor · 2025-02-07
- Adjudicator
- Jeremy Henderson
- Dispute
- Substantial Interference
- Notice
- N5
- Amount
- <$5K
- Landlord
- W.A.
- Tenant
- R.A.M.
- Landlord rep
- Vicenzo Piruzza
- Tenant rep
- Daniel Zia
What happened
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenant due to substantial interference with the Landlord's reasonable enjoyment or lawful right, privilege or interest. The Landlord also claimed compensation for unpaid utility costs and reasonable out-of-pocket expenses.
The ruling
The Landlord proved the Tenant and occupants substantially interfered with the Landlord's efforts to sell the property, but the Landlord did not prove the claim for compensation for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. The Tenant is ordered to pay $562.02 for unpaid utility costs and application fees. The tenancy will continue if the Tenant complies with conditions to not interfere with future sales efforts.