Bamford v Redekop
Landlord wins · Aylmer · 2024-05-07
- Adjudicator
- Mayra Sawicki
- Dispute
- Substantial Interference
- Notice
- Substantial interference (N5)
- Amount
- $10-20K
- Landlord
- J.B.
- Tenant
- C.R., J.F.
- Landlord rep
- B.A. Connors, C. Hawley
What happened
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenants due to substantial interference with the reasonable enjoyment or lawful right, privilege or interest of the Landlord or another Tenants. The Landlord served a valid N5 notice, which the Tenants did not void. The Tenants were causing ongoing noise disturbances that affected other tenants in the building.
The ruling
The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenants due to substantial interference with the reasonable enjoyment or lawful right, privilege or interest of the Landlord or another Tenants was granted. The Tenants must vacate the unit by May 18, 2024 and pay the Landlord $10,868.07, which includes compensation for use of the unit and the application filing fee, minus the rent deposit and interest.