Cardinal Residence v Martin
Tenant wins · Hamilton · 2025-11-06
- Adjudicator
- Rachel Gibbons
- Dispute
- Substantial Interference
- Notice
- Substantial interference (N5)
- Landlord
- C.R.
- Tenant
- K.W.M.
- Landlord rep
- Ashley Friel, Cheri Murray
What happened
The Landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant based on allegations of substantial interference with the reasonable enjoyment of the complex. The Landlord alleged the Tenant was loud, intoxicated, urinated in improper places, was combative with staff, had a physical altercation with another tenant, and exposed himself to a staff member. The hearing proceeded in the absence of the Tenant.
The ruling
The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant is dismissed. The Landlord failed to provide sufficient, reliable evidence to prove that the Tenant substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment of the residential complex, as the testimony provided was entirely hearsay and the direct witnesses were not called to testify.