Chapman v M and R Holdings

Landlord wins · North York · 2025-09-24

Adjudicator

Dawn Carr

Dispute

Damage to Property, Harassment, Illegal Entry, Substantial Interference

Landlord

M and R Holdings

Tenant

B.R.C.

Landlord rep

Randy Daiter, Kevin Lundy

Tenant rep

Bradley Chapman

What happened

The Tenant filed an application alleging that the Landlord entered the unit illegally, substantially interfered with their reasonable enjoyment through construction activities, and harassed or threatened them. Specifically, the Tenant cited noise, dust, and fumes from repairs to heating systems, and alleged that the Landlord disposed of or stole valuable personal items following a Sheriff-enforced eviction.

The ruling

The Tenant's application is dismissed in its entirety. The Board found the Landlord acted reasonably during construction and repairs. The Tenant failed to provide sufficient evidence to support claims of illegal entry or the theft/loss of personal property following the legal eviction by the Sheriff.