Checkeredfield Consulting & Management Inc. v Marchment

Split/Other wins · Hanover · 2025-07-04

Adjudicator

Alicia Johnson

Dispute

Damage to Property, Non-payment of Rent, Substantial Interference, Utilities

Notice

Non-payment of rent (N4), Substantial interference (N5)

Amount

<$5K

Landlord

Checkeredfield Consulting & Management Inc.

Tenant

D.G.M., K.A.M., D.M.

Landlord rep

Negar Motamed-Khorasani

Tenant rep

Sandra Holyer (Support person)

What happened

The Landlord applied to terminate the tenancy based on non-payment of rent, substantial interference, and damages. Additionally, the Landlord sought compensation for unpaid utility costs and out-of-pocket expenses. By the hearing date, the Tenants had paid the rent arrears in full ($7,918.75), leading to the discontinuance of the non-payment application. The Landlord's claims for damages and substantial interference were dismissed due to procedural errors with the notices and a lack of evidence for specific costs.

The ruling

The eviction application was denied. The Tenants cleared all rent arrears prior to the hearing. The Landlord's claims for damages and behavioral interference were dismissed due to invalid notices and insufficient evidence. The Tenants are ordered to pay $569.61 to the Landlord, covering outstanding utility bills and the application filing fee.