Evictly

Coburn v Triantos

Tenant wins · Toronto · 2025-09-02

Adjudicator
Dana Wren
Dispute
Maintenance, Substantial Interference, Tenant Rights
Notice
Tenant rights (T2), Maintenance (T6)
Amount
<$5K
Landlord
A.T.
Tenant
A.C.
Landlord rep
Panagiotis Balatidis
Tenant rep
Joseph Behar

What happened

The Tenant applied for an order regarding illegal entry, substantial interference with enjoyment, and maintenance issues. The Tenant alleged that the Landlord covered in-unit security cameras, used the Tenant's kitchen spatula and chair to perform drywall repairs, and failed to address a mouse infestation and a roof leak in a timely manner. The Landlord admitted to covering the cameras and using the spatula, claiming a dislike of being recorded.

The ruling

The Landlord is ordered to pay the Tenant $1,048.00, consisting of a $1,000.00 rent abatement for substantial interference and the $48.00 filing fee. The interference was established based on the Landlord's admission of covering security cameras and using the Tenant's kitchen spatula and furniture for maintenance. Maintenance claims regarding mice and a roof leak were dismissed as the Landlord acted reasonably.