Di Bastiano v Smith
Tenant wins · Guelph · 2025-07-04
- Adjudicator
- Harry Cho
- Dispute
- Unauthorized Occupant
- Landlord
- C.D.B.
- Tenant
- S.S., B.M.
What happened
The Landlord sought a review of a previous order which dismissed his application to terminate the tenancy. The Landlord alleged that Tenant 1 and Tenant 2 had transferred occupancy of the unit to Unauthorized Occupants (the tenants' children) without consent. The original order found that Tenant 1 retained possession of the unit despite a temporary absence caused by a court order prohibiting her from the property.
The ruling
The Landlord's request for a review was denied. The Board confirmed that Tenant 1 did not transfer occupancy of the rental unit to unauthorized persons. Despite being legally prohibited from the property by a court order, Tenant 1's retention of belongings, pets, and utility accounts demonstrated continued possession of the unit. The original order dismissing the eviction remains in effect.