Direzze v Kaufman
Landlord wins · Richmond Hill · 2024-09-27
- Adjudicator
- Alicia Johnson
- Dispute
- Substantial Interference
- Notice
- N5
- Amount
- $10-20K
- Landlord
- A.D., L.D.
- Tenant
- I.K., S.H.
- Landlord rep
- Sassan Emam
- Tenant rep
- Mitchell Kent
What happened
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant due to the Tenant's substantial interference with the reasonable enjoyment or lawful right, privilege or interest of the Landlord or another tenant. The Landlord alleged the Tenant refused to allow access to the rental unit for inspections and maintenance, and the unit was in an unsanitary condition.
The ruling
The Landlord's application is granted. The tenancy is terminated effective October 8, 2024. The Tenant must vacate the unit by that date. The Tenant owes the Landlord $19,336.12, which includes compensation for use and occupation of the unit, the application filing fee, and interest on the rent deposit. If the Tenant does not pay the full amount by October 8, 2024, they will owe interest at 7% annually on the outstanding balance.