Hansen v Carter
Landlord wins · Blyth · 2025-03-06
- Adjudicator
- Julie Broderick
- Dispute
- Substantial Interference
- Notice
- N5
- Amount
- <$5K
- Landlord
- P.H., M.G.
- Tenant
- K.C.
- Landlord rep
- Kristen Jarvis
- Tenant rep
- Aron Van De Kleut
What happened
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenant due to Tenant's failure to clean up excess refuse in the backyard and use of a pole/stake to tie up their unattended dog in the common area, which substantially interfered with the Landlord's reasonable enjoyment or lawful right, privilege or interest. The Landlord also claimed compensation for each day the Tenant remained in the unit after the termination date.
The ruling
The Landlord's L2 application is granted, but relief from eviction is granted subject to the Tenant meeting certain conditions. The Tenant's request for review of the original order is granted. The Landlord's L4 application is dismissed as moot.