Henley Crescent v Browne
Landlord wins · Etobicoke · 2025-05-01
- Adjudicator
- Camille Tancioco
- Dispute
- Review Request, Tenant-initiated Termination
- Notice
- Tenant's Notice to End the Tenancy (N9)
- Landlord
- H.C.
- Tenant
- R.B.
- Landlord rep
- R. Zafirovska, A. Weavers, K. Lundy
- Tenant rep
- F. Salim
What happened
An occupant requested a review of a prior LTB order. The prior order had granted the Landlord's review, overturned a set-aside decision, and effectively reinstated an eviction order based on an N9 notice signed only by the official tenant. The occupant argued the reviewing member made serious errors in determining she was not an implied tenant and in the procedural handling of the review. This current order denies the occupant's review request, finding no serious error in the previous member's decision.
The ruling
The Board denies the occupant's request to review the previous order (LTB-L-015507-24-RV). The Board finds no serious error in the previous order, which had determined that the occupant was not a tenant and that the Landlord's original eviction application based on the tenant's N9 notice was valid. The stay on the previous order is lifted, confirming the eviction process can proceed.