HI LO INVESTMENTS v KARCZMARCZYK
Tenant wins · Etobicoke · 2025-05-12
- Adjudicator
- Panagiotis Peter Roupas
- Dispute
- Non-payment of Rent
- Notice
- Non-payment of rent (N4)
- Landlord
- HI LO INVESTMENTS
- Tenant
- M.K.
- Landlord rep
- Thomas Simpson, Jeff Shabes
- Tenant rep
- Roman Andrzejewski
What happened
The Landlord filed an application to evict the Tenant for non-payment of rent. The Tenant's representative argued that the N4 Notice of Termination was invalid because it incorrectly stated the amount of rent arrears, failing to account for a payment made by the Tenant. The Board agreed, found the N4 notice to be void, and dismissed the Landlord's application.
The ruling
The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant is dismissed. The dismissal is based on the finding that the N4 Notice of Termination was invalid due to an incorrect calculation of rent arrears.