Evictly

KEERTHI v HAIDER

Landlord wins · Whitby · 2025-12-04

Adjudicator
Richard Ferriss
Dispute
Non-payment of Rent
Landlord
A.K., S.A.
Tenant
F.H.

What happened

The Tenant requested a review of an eviction order issued for non-payment of rent. The Tenant claimed they were denied the opportunity to raise maintenance issues (Section 82) during the original hearing because they did not receive an interim order outlining disclosure requirements. The Board found that the Tenant had received oral instructions and a deadline during a prior hearing which they failed to meet.

The ruling

The request for review is denied. The original order issued on October 30, 2025, which terminated the tenancy and ordered eviction due to non-payment of rent, remains in full force. The Tenant failed to demonstrate that a serious error occurred or that they were unable to participate reasonably in the hearing.