Khatri v Clarke
Landlord wins · Tottenham · 2025-09-03
- Adjudicator
- Dana Wren
- Dispute
- Non-payment of Rent, Substantial Interference, Utility Costs
- Notice
- Non-payment of rent (N4), Substantial interference (N5)
- Amount
- <$5K
- Landlord
- U.V.K., V.A.P.
- Tenant
- I.C., A.C.
- Landlord rep
- Mehria Qarizadha
- Tenant rep
- Chief Michael
What happened
The Landlords originally applied for eviction based on non-payment of rent, substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment, and unpaid utility costs. An order was issued on July 9, 2025. The Tenants filed for a review of this order. During the review hearing, the Tenants attempted to have an unidentified individual ('Chief Michael') represent them. This individual refused to provide his full name and behaved aggressively, leading to his exclusion. The Tenants refused to proceed without him, resulting in the dismissal of their review request.
The ruling
The Tenants' request to review the previous eviction order was denied because they refused to proceed with the hearing after their unidentified and aggressive representative was excluded. The original order issued on July 9, 2025, remains in effect and the stay is lifted. The Tenants are ordered to pay the Landlords $100.00 in costs for unreasonable conduct during the proceedings.