LA MARCA v SHIELDS
Landlord wins · Oshawa · 2023-05-11
- Adjudicator
- Amanda Kovats
- Dispute
- Termination of Tenancy
- Notice
- Termination of Tenancy (N11)
- Amount
- <$5K
- Landlord
- E.L.M.
- Tenant
- I.S.
- Landlord rep
- Greanya D
What happened
The landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant because the tenant entered into an agreement to terminate the tenancy. The tenant filed a motion to set aside the original ex parte order, which was granted. The landlord's review of the dismissal order was granted, and the application proceeded to a de novo motion hearing. The tenant then requested a review of the review order, which was granted.
The ruling
The Board denied the tenant's motion to set aside the original ex parte order, but delayed the lifting of the stay until June 30, 2023 to provide the 86-year-old tenant with additional time to find new living accommodations. The tenancy is terminated effective June 30, 2023, and the tenant must pay the landlord $201 for the cost of filing the application.