Litvack v Dieudonnée

Landlord wins · Toronto · 2024-10-24

Adjudicator

Alexandre Traboulsi

Dispute

Substantial Interference

Notice

Substantial interference (N5)

Amount

<$5K

Landlord

L.L.

Tenant

E.D.

Landlord rep

Barrington Lue Sang

Tenant rep

Christopher Karas

What happened

Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenant due to Tenant's refusal to interact with the Landlord's designated property manager, refusal to confirm the number of occupants, and refusal to submit rent payments to the designated property manager.

The ruling

The Landlord's application can proceed as the Landlord filed it after the 7-day remedy period. The Landlord has the right to name a property manager, and the Tenant must comply by communicating with the manager, providing occupant information, and paying rent to the manager (but not by direct withdrawal). The Tenant is granted relief from eviction subject to conditions, including paying the application fee.