Evictly

Mangat v Mondoux

Tenant wins · Kitchener · 2025-04-30

Adjudicator
John Cashmore
Dispute
Damage to Property, Substantial Interference
Notice
Inconsistent use causing damage (N7)
Landlord
H.M.
Tenant
M.M.
Landlord rep
licensee of the Law Society of Ontario

What happened

The Landlord requested a review of a previous order that dismissed their application to evict the Tenant and claim $30,000 in damages. The original application, based on an N7 notice, alleged the Tenant's hoarding was inconsistent with residential use and likely to cause significant damage. The LTB denied the review request, finding no serious error in the original decision, which concluded there was insufficient evidence for the allegations or the damage claim.

The ruling

The Landlord's request to review order LTB-L-061651-24 is denied. The adjudicator found no serious error in the original proceeding or order. The original order, which dismissed the Landlord's application to evict the Tenant for inconsistent use/hoarding and a claim for $30,000 in damages, is confirmed and remains unchanged.