Evictly

Mokhtarihajiyar v Charmchi

Tenant wins · North York · 2024-10-07

Adjudicator
Vladimir Nikitin
Dispute
Alteration Of Locks, Harassment, Substantial Interference
Landlord
P.K., A.C.
Tenant
A.M., K.A., L.A.R., I.T.
Landlord rep
David Anton
Tenant rep
Joe Myers

What happened

Tenant applied for an order determining that Landlord altered the locking system on a door giving entry to the rental unit or residential complex without giving the Tenant replacement keys, substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment of the rental unit or residential complex by the Tenant or by a member of their household, and harassed, obstructed, coerced, threatened or interfered with the Tenant.

The ruling

The Landlord altered the locking system, substantially interfered with the Tenant's reasonable enjoyment, and harassed the Tenant. The Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 applies. The Landlord must pay the Tenant $6,792.65 and an administrative fine of $10,000 to the LTB.