Morady v Baharvandi
Split/Other wins · North York · 2025-07-08
- Adjudicator
- Benjamin Seigel
- Dispute
- Review Of Order, Tenant-initiated Termination
- Landlord
- M.M.
- Tenant
- S.B.
- Landlord rep
- Alireza Hesami
- Tenant rep
- Princess Doe
What happened
The Landlord originally applied to terminate the tenancy based on an agreement or notice from the Tenant (L3 application). After an initial order was issued in the Landlord's favor, the Tenant filed multiple review requests claiming they were unable to participate and that the order contained serious errors. During the review hearing, the Landlord consented to the review and requested to withdraw the original application because the tenancy had already ended and rent arrears could not be determined under an L3 application.
The ruling
The LTB granted the Tenant's request to review two previous orders. Upon granting the review, the original order from November 12, 2024, which had determined the Tenant owed arrears, was vacated and is no longer of any legal effect. The Landlord was permitted to withdraw the original termination application (L3) as the tenancy had already ended, resulting in a dismissal of the application.