Multani v Ram

Landlord wins · Brampton · 2025-07-04

Adjudicator

Harry Cho

Dispute

Non-payment of Rent

Landlord

J.M.

Tenant

A.C.R.

What happened

The Tenant requested a review of an order issued on June 13, 2025, which required the Tenant to pay rent arrears. The Tenant claimed they were unable to participate effectively in the hearing and that the adjudicator erred by refusing to adjourn the hearing or join it with the Tenant's own applications. The Tenant also disputed findings of fact regarding rent payments made in early 2024.

The ruling

The Tenant's request for a review of the June 13, 2025, order is denied. The original order, which determined rent arrears were owed to the Landlord, remains in full effect. The Board found the Tenant was afforded procedural fairness and failed to prove any serious error in the original adjudicator's decision to proceed with the hearing or their assessment of the evidence regarding rent payments.