Ong v Victoria
Tenant wins · Toronto · 2024-09-20
- Adjudicator
- Sheena Brar
- Dispute
- Illegal Act, Substantial Interference
- Notice
- N6 Notice of Termination - Illegal Act, N5 Notice of Termination - Substantial Interference
- Landlord
- W.M.O.
- Tenant
- C.V.
- Landlord rep
- Patricia Ong
What happened
The Landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant due to allegations that the Tenant substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment of the property and committed an illegal act by using the residential unit for massage therapy sessions. The Landlord served the Tenant with N6 and N5 notices, but the Landlord's application was dismissed as the notices were found to be deficient in providing sufficient details to allow the Tenant to know the case to be met.
The ruling
The Landlord's application is dismissed as the Landlord failed to provide sufficient details in the N6 and N5 notices to allow the Tenant to know the case to be met, and the Landlord did not give the Tenant an opportunity to void the N5 notice within 7 days.