Patel v Choi Tam
Tenant wins · Scarborough · 2025-07-09
- Adjudicator
- Carrie Bertrand
- Dispute
- Personal Use
- Notice
- Personal use (N12)
- Landlord
- R.P.
- Tenant
- R.C.T., C.C.S., L.L.
- Landlord rep
- Alaa Nahhab
- Tenant rep
- Jie Situ
What happened
The Landlord applied to terminate the tenancy because they required the unit for the residential occupation of the Landlord's child for at least one year. The Landlord served an N12 notice with a termination date of April 30, 2025. However, the Landlord failed to pay the required compensation to the Tenants or offer an acceptable alternative unit before the termination date, which is a mandatory requirement under the Act.
The ruling
The Landlord's application for eviction for personal use was dismissed. Although the Landlord intended for their child to move into the unit, they failed to pay the mandatory one-month rent compensation required by law before the termination date of the N12 notice. Consequently, the Board could not issue an eviction order.