Pedro v Saeedfaraji
Landlord wins · Toronto · 2025-05-20
- Adjudicator
- Dana Wren
- Dispute
- Breach of Conditions, Harassment, Illegal Entry, Substantial Interference, Withheld Vital Services
- Landlord
- M.S.
- Tenant
- G.P.
- Tenant rep
- Angelina Goulagh
What happened
The Tenant filed a T2 application alleging the Landlord engaged in illegal entry, changed locks, substantially interfered with her enjoyment, harassed her, and withheld vital services. These alleged events occurred after a previous consent order was made on May 30, 2023, which terminated the tenancy for June 15, 2023. The Tenant did not vacate as per the order and was eventually evicted by the Sheriff on July 20, 2023. The adjudicator viewed the application as an attempt to reverse the consent order due to 'tenant's regret'.
The ruling
The Tenant's application is dismissed. The adjudicator found that the Tenant failed to prove her allegations of Landlord misconduct, which included illegal entry, harassment, and changing locks. The Landlord was found to be a credible witness who acted appropriately by following the eviction process through the Sheriff after the Tenant failed to vacate per a previous consent order. The Board concluded that the true motivation for the application was the Tenant's regret over agreeing to terminate the tenancy.