Proulx v Ainsley

Landlord wins · Scarborough · 2024-12-17

Adjudicator

Harry Cho

Dispute

Substantial Interference

Landlord

M.P.

Tenant

A.A.

What happened

The Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant because the Tenant, another occupant of the rental unit or someone the Tenant permitted in the residential complex has substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment or lawful right, privilege or interest of the Landlord or another tenant. The Landlord also applied for an order requiring the Tenant to pay the Landlord's reasonable out-of-pocket expenses that are the result of the Tenant's failure to pay utility costs they were required to pay under the terms of the tenancy agreement.

The ruling

The Board Member denied the Tenant's request to review the December 5, 2024 order, confirming that order remains unchanged.