Qunilan v Le Saux

Landlord wins · Toronto · 2025-07-04

Adjudicator

Harry Cho

Dispute

Bad Faith Eviction

Notice

Agreement to terminate (N11)

Landlord

J.L.

Tenant

E.Q.

What happened

The Tenant applied for a review of a previous review order which had upheld the validity of an N11 Agreement to End the Tenancy. The Tenant argued that the agreement was invalid because it only provided for $1.00 in monetary consideration and claimed that a previous LTB finding should have barred the review under the doctrine of res judicata. The Landlord maintained that the agreement was valid as it provided the Tenant with three additional months of occupancy, constituting sufficient consideration under contract law.

The ruling

The Tenant's request for a review of the May 13, 2025 order is denied. The Board confirmed that the N11 agreement signed by the parties was a valid contract supported by sufficient consideration (the extension of the tenancy). As a result, the Tenant's application for bad faith termination was dismissed, and the previous order remains in effect.