RAKOCZI VILLA II. v Parvez Ahmed

Tenant wins · Toronto · 2024-03-27

Adjudicator

Brett Lockwood

Dispute

Damage to Property, Illegal Act, Substantial Interference

Notice

N5, N6

Amount

<$5K

Landlord

R.V.I.

Tenant

K.P.A.

Landlord rep

Leo Corsetti

What happened

Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant due to the Tenant, another occupant, or someone the Tenant permitted in the residential complex substantially interfering with the Landlord's lawful right, privilege or interest, wilfully or negligently causing damage to the premises, and committing an illegal act or carrying out an illegal trade, business or occupation in the rental unit or the residential complex.

The ruling

The Landlord's application is dismissed. The Landlord has not proven that the Tenant, an occupant of the Tenant's rental unit, has committed wilful or negligent damage. The Landlord has also not proven that the Tenant, or an occupant of the Tenant's rental unit, committed an illegal act in the rental unit.